Which prospects sprinted up—and which fell—after the 2026 Combine?
The testing didn’t just impress scouts. It rewrote draft boards across every position.
Record 40 times and verticals pushed some players from late rounds into Day 2, while slow times, missed drills, or opting out knocked others down.
This post breaks down position-by-position risers and fallers, shows the measurables that changed grades, and explains who gained real draft leverage and who needs a big pro day to recover.
Biggest Risers and Fallers of the 2026 NFL Combine (Quick Summary)
The 2026 NFL Scouting Combine gave us clear winners and losers. Athletic testing shifted draft boards at every position. Players who mixed elite speed with explosion climbed fast. Prospects who skipped drills, ran slow times, or couldn’t catch cleanly saw their stock drop.
This year’s class set position records in 40-yard dash times for defensive linemen, linebackers, defensive backs, tight ends, and running backs compared to classes going back to 2003.
Athletic freaks went up. Opt-outs and disappointments went down. Teams now have hard numbers to confirm or challenge what film showed, and several prospects moved from Day 3 projections into Saturday conversations while others dropped from potential Day 2 selections into the late rounds.
Major Risers:
- Mike Washington (RB, Arkansas) – Posted a historic 10.0 RAS score (No. 1 among all RBs since 1987) with a 4.33 40, moved from Day 3 into Day 2 range
- Kenyon Sadiq (TE, Oregon) – Ran 4.39 at 6-3, 241 lbs. with a 43.5-inch vertical and 11-1 broad jump. Now he’s got a real shot at the top 10
- Eli Stowers (TE, TCU) – 2025 John Mackey Award winner posted combine-record 45.5-inch vertical and 11-3 broad jump. Locked in as TE2 in the class
- Taylen Green (QB, Arkansas) – 6-6, 227 lbs. with a 4.36 40, position-record 43.5-inch vertical, and 11-2 broad jump. Rare athletic profile for the position
Major Fallers:
- Carson Beck (QB, Georgia) – Struggled with accuracy and arm strength in passing drills. Became the first prospect ever booed at the combine
- Carnell Tate (WR, Ohio State) – Entered as consensus WR1 but ran 4.53 with a 1.61 10-yard split at 6-2, 192 lbs. His lead as top receiver took a hit
- Emmett Johnson (RB, Nebraska) – Posted class-worst 4.56 40 and weak broad jump. Likely fell from Day 2 expectations into Day 3
- Denzel Boston (WR, Washington) – Declined 40 and broad jump, posted 35-inch vertical, and had multiple drops in route work. Stock cooled after early hype
Quarterback Stock Movement Breakdown
Quarterback evaluation at the combine is always tricky. Live-throwing sessions don’t give you much context, and teams weigh cognitive testing, leadership interviews, and measurables alongside on-field drills. This year, the 2026 QB class showed wide variance in athletic ability, on-field precision, and maturity markers. A few prospects locked in top-tier draft capital with clean workouts and ideal measurements. Others raised red flags that will take strong pro days to overcome.
Drew Allar climbed into the Tier 2 conversation after posting elite measurements across the board. At 6-5, 238 lbs., he ranked top three among quarterbacks in hand size, arm length, and wingspan. Limited on-field throwing work across the entire QB group made measurables more important than usual. Allar’s frame paired with his 2024 college production now projects him as the likely second or third quarterback off the board in April.
Ty Simpson also moved up after showing accuracy in on-field workouts at 6-1, 211 lbs. He’s cemented his place as the No. 2 QB in the class behind Fernando Mendoza and potentially landing in Round 1 despite just 15 total college starts.
Carson Beck became the story for all the wrong reasons. He struggled visibly with accuracy and power in passing drills and became the first prospect in combine history to be booed by the crowd. That kind of public reaction signals real concerns about his mechanics under scrutiny. Teams will need to see a complete turnaround at his pro day to justify early-round capital.
Diego Pavia reinforced maturity doubts with a poorly timed public joke about brain development, compounding existing concerns about his size in a deep quarterback class. Cole Payton, who measured 6-3, 232 lbs. and ran a respectable 4.56 40, remains in the conversation but didn’t separate himself enough to shift mock boards.
QB Risers:
- Drew Allar (Penn State) – Top-three measurements among QBs in hand size, arm length, wingspan. Moved into Tier 2, likely QB2 or QB3 off the board
- Ty Simpson (Alabama) – Showed accuracy in on-field work at 6-1, 211 lbs. Solidified as No. 2 QB in class, potential Round 1 pick
- Taylen Green (Arkansas) – 6-6, 227 lbs. with 4.36 40, position-record 43.5-inch vertical, 11-2 broad jump. Rare athletic measurables elevate draft intrigue
QB Fallers:
- Carson Beck (Georgia) – Struggled with accuracy and power in passing drills. First prospect ever booed at the combine
- Diego Pavia (Vanderbilt) – Public maturity concerns and size doubts reinforced red flags. Fell in a deep QB class
- Cole Payton (Buffalo) – 6-3, 232 lbs., 4.56 40. Solid but didn’t separate, remains in the mix without rising
Running Back Stock Movement Breakdown
The 2026 running back class entered the combine labeled as one of the weakest in recent memory. Projections suggested as few as three to four backs might be selected before Day 3. That context made every tenth of a second and every inch of explosion critical for prospects trying to carve out early-round value. Athletic testing separated the contenders from the filler, and a handful of backs posted historic numbers that will force teams to reconsider positional value in Rounds 2 and 3.
Mike Washington dominated. The Arkansas back posted the No. 1 RAS score (10.0) for all running backs since 1987, running a 4.33 40 with a 1.51 10-yard split, a 39-inch vertical jump, and a 10-8 broad jump. At 223 lbs., Washington showed rare speed for his size and moved from a Day 3 projection into legitimate Day 2 consideration.
Jeremiyah Love, the 2025 Doak Walker Award winner, ran 4.36 at 6-0, 212 lbs. and is now expected to move into the top 10 of the 2026 NFL draft.
Jadarian Price disappointed after entering as the consensus No. 2 running back in the class. He ran a slow 4.49 40 with a 1.61 10-yard split (second-worst in the class) at 5-11, 203 lbs. His stock took a hit relative to expectations.
Emmett Johnson posted the class-worst 4.56 40 at 5-10, 202 lbs., though he did manage a 7.32 three-cone drill. He’s likely sliding to Day 3 after Day 2 buzz earlier in the cycle.
RB Risers:
- Mike Washington (Arkansas) – 4.33 40, 1.51 10-yard split, 39-inch vertical, 10-8 broad jump. No. 1 RAS since 1987. Moved from Day 3 to Day 2
- Jeremiyah Love (Notre Dame) – 2025 Doak Walker Award winner ran 4.36 at 6-0, 212 lbs. Expected to move into top 10 of 2026 draft
- Seth McGowan (Kentucky) – 10-11 broad jump (led class), 4.49 40, 1.52 10-yard split. Potential late-round pick with rotational upside
RB Fallers:
- Jadarian Price (Notre Dame) – Consensus No. 2 RB entering combine ran disappointing 4.49 40 with 1.61 10-yard split at 5-11, 203 lbs.
- Emmett Johnson (Nebraska) – Class-worst 4.56 40 at 5-10, 202 lbs. Likely fell from Day 2 expectations to Day 3
- Nicholas Singleton (Penn State) – Did not test due to late-season foot injury. May not be ready until close to draft, risking momentum and late evaluation windows
Wide Receiver Stock Movement Breakdown
Wide receiver is always one of the most volatile position groups at the combine because speed, explosion, and hands all get tested in front of everyone. This year, several big-bodied receivers who dominated on film struggled to show complementary athleticism. Smaller speed threats posted elite numbers that vaulted them up draft boards. Route-running drills and catch-point consistency added another layer, separating polished technicians from raw athletes who need development time.
Chris Brazzell helped himself. The Tennessee receiver measured 6-4, 198 lbs. and ran a 4.37 40 with a 1.52 10-yard split after posting 62-1,017-9 receiving in 12 games. That kind of size-speed combo is rare, and he’s now firmly in the Day 2 conversation.
Omar Cooper posted a 4.42 40 with a 1.55 10-yard split and a 37-inch vertical after a 69-937-13 receiving season at Indiana.
Jeff Caldwell offered one of the combine’s biggest surprises. At 6-5, 216 lbs., he posted a 42-inch vertical (second among WRs, seventh-best over the past five years) and the best 10-yard split in the group.
Zachariah Branch ran 4.35 at 5-10, 180 lbs. and climbed to WR8 on consensus boards after some peers stumbled.
Carnell Tate entered as the consensus No. 1 wide receiver but ran a disappointing 4.53 40 with a 1.61 10-yard split at 6-2, 192 lbs. His lead as the top receiver in the class diminished quickly.
Malachi Fields measured 6-5, 218 lbs. but posted a slow 4.61 40 with a 1.63 10-yard split and a 6.98 three-cone, causing him to drop out of Daniel Jeremiah’s top 50.
Denzel Boston declined the 40 and broad jump, posted just a 35-inch vertical, and had multiple drops in route work with poor separation in drills. His stock cooled significantly unless his pro day can reset the narrative.
WR Risers:
- Chris Brazzell (Tennessee) – 6-4, 198 lbs., 4.37 40, 1.52 10-yard split. Rare size-speed combo
- Omar Cooper (Indiana) – 4.42 40, 1.55 10-yard split, 37-inch vertical. 69-937-13 receiving in 2025. Moved into late first-round conversation
- Jeff Caldwell (Cincinnati) – 6-5, 216 lbs., 42-inch vertical (2nd among WRs), best 10-yard split in group. Late-round dynasty radar
- Zachariah Branch (Georgia) – 4.35 40 at 5-10, 180 lbs. Climbed to WR8 on consensus boards
WR Fallers:
- Carnell Tate (Ohio State) – Consensus WR1 entering combine ran 4.53 40 with 1.61 10-yard split at 6-2, 192 lbs. Lead as top WR diminished
- Malachi Fields (Notre Dame) – 6-5, 218 lbs. but ran slow 4.61 40 with 1.63 10-yard split. Dropped out of Daniel Jeremiah’s top 50
- Denzel Boston (Washington) – Declined 40 and broad jump, posted 35-inch vertical, had multiple drops and poor separation in route drills
- Jermod McCoy (Tennessee CB) – Didn’t participate in combine after not playing in 2025. Lost all momentum
Tight End Stock Movement Breakdown
Tight end athletic testing can reshape draft boards faster than almost any other position. Teams are hunting for that rare blend of size, speed, and explosion that signals a true mismatch weapon. This year’s class delivered two prospects who posted historic combine performances and locked themselves into early-round conversations. Opt-outs and middling testing pushed others down boards.
Kenyon Sadiq posted one of the best tight end performances in combine history. At 6-3, 241 lbs., he ran a 4.39 40 with a 1.54 10-yard split, a 43.5-inch vertical jump, and an 11-1 broad jump. Daniel Jeremiah bumped him up three spots to 13th overall. His blend of competitive attitude, physical run-after-catch ability on film, and elite athletic profile now gives him a real shot at a top-10 selection.
Eli Stowers, the 2025 John Mackey Award winner, measured 6-4, 239 lbs. and ran a 4.51 40 with a 1.59 10-yard split. He posted a combine-record 45.5-inch vertical jump and an 11-3 broad jump, locking himself in as the No. 2 tight end in the class and likely a Round 1 pick.
John Michael Gyllenborg ran 4.60 at 6-6, 249 lbs., ranked sixth among tight ends in the 40, and posted the fourth-best 10-yard split among tight ends. He moved from Tier 6 to Tier 3 and from a Day 3 projection into a Saturday-call possibility.
Michael Trigg measured an 84 3/8-inch wingspan but declined to participate in drills. That opt-out cost him momentum, and he’ll need a strong pro day to regain traction after sliding on boards.
TE Risers:
- Kenyon Sadiq (Oregon) – 6-3, 241 lbs., 4.39 40, 1.54 10-yard split, 43.5-inch vertical, 11-1 broad jump. Real shot at top 10
- Eli Stowers (TCU) – 6-4, 239 lbs., 4.51 40, combine-record 45.5-inch vertical, 11-3 broad jump. Locked in as TE2, likely Round 1
- John Michael Gyllenborg (Wyoming) – 4.60 at 6-6, 249 lbs., fourth-best 10-yard split among TEs. Moved from Tier 6 to Tier 3
TE Fallers:
- Michael Trigg (Baylor) – 84 3/8-inch wingspan but declined drills. Opt-out cost momentum, needs strong pro day
- Jadarian Price (Notre Dame) – Entered as clear TE2 but middling testing kept him in second-round range without upside push
- Omar Cooper (Indiana) – Solid but unspectacular athletic testing. Remained in late second-round conversation without separating
Offensive Line Stock Movement Breakdown
Offensive line evaluation at the combine centers on movement skills, functional strength, and how well size translates to agility. Teams want to see tackles move in space, guards dominate the bench press, and everyone show clean footwork in pass-protection drills. This year’s class featured a few linemen who showed up at ideal playing weight and posted numbers that confirmed first-round grades. Others raised concerns about their ability to handle speed rushers at the next level.
Spencer Fano turned heads with a 4.91 40, showing rare movement ability for a tackle prospect. That kind of foot speed is critical for teams running wide-zone schemes or asking tackles to reach the second level in the run game.
Kadyn Proctor showed up at an ideal 352 lbs. after questions about his conditioning. His combination of size and clean movement drills helped solidify his standing as a top-tier tackle prospect. Both players are now firmly in the first-round conversation, with Proctor potentially climbing into the top 15 depending on team needs.
Several interior linemen struggled to separate themselves with middling bench-press totals and slower shuttle times. Teams looking for immediate plug-and-play guards will likely focus on prospects who dominated the strength testing and showed quick first steps in one-on-one drills. The drop-off from the top tier to the next group is steep, which could push teams to reach earlier than expected if they need offensive line help.
OL Risers:
- Spencer Fano (Utah) – Ran 4.91 40. Rare movement ability for a tackle prospect
- Kadyn Proctor (Alabama) – Showed up at ideal weight of 352 lbs. Combination of size and clean movement drills solidified first-round standing
- Caleb Banks (Florida DT) – Measured 6-6, 327 lbs. Size and length make him intriguing as a developmental tackle or guard
OL Fallers:
- Lee Hunter (Texas Tech DT) – Bottom-two at position in 40 and jumps. Concerns about lateral mobility
- R Mason Thomas (Oklahoma EDGE) – Measured 6-2, 241 lbs. and ran 4.67 40. Undersized for interior, too slow for edge
- Cashius Howell (Texas A&M EDGE) – Measured 30.25-inch arms. Length concerns for tackle spots
Defensive Line / Edge Stock Movement Breakdown
Defensive line and edge rusher evaluation hinges on explosion, first-step quickness, and functional strength. Teams want to see prospects who can bend around the edge, collapse the pocket from the interior, and show the kind of twitch that translates to disruption on Sundays. This year’s combine class delivered several athletic freaks who vaulted up boards. A few highly touted prospects fell after disappointing testing or concerning measurements.
Arvell Reese and Sonny Styles, both from Ohio State, posted elite numbers across the board and confirmed their status as athletic freaks.
David Bailey ran a 4.50 40, showing rare speed for an edge rusher and giving teams confidence he can chase down mobile quarterbacks.
Caleb Banks measured 6-6, 327 lbs., offering the kind of size and length that teams covet for interior disruption.
Kaleb Proctor from Southeastern Louisiana finished top-five among defensive tackles in both 40 and jumps, raising his profile from a small-school sleeper to a potential Day 2 selection.
Anthony Hill ran a 4.51 40 at linebacker size, giving defensive coordinators flexibility to use him as a hybrid edge or off-ball option.
Rueben Bain measured under 31-inch arms, which raises red flags for edge rushers who need length to disengage from tackles and set the edge in the run game.
Cashius Howell posted 30.25-inch arms, compounding similar concerns.
R Mason Thomas measured 6-2, 241 lbs. and ran a slow 4.67 40, leaving him undersized for the interior and too slow for edge work.
Lee Hunter finished bottom-two at his position in both 40 and jumps, raising questions about his ability to win with quickness or explosion at the next level.
DL/Edge Risers:
- Arvell Reese (Ohio State) – Athletic freak with elite testing across the board
- Sonny Styles (Ohio State) – Athletic freak with versatility to play multiple spots
- David Bailey (Texas Tech) – Ran 4.50 40. Rare speed for an edge rusher
- Kaleb Proctor (Southeastern Louisiana) – Top-five among DTs in 40 and jumps. Small-school sleeper now in Day 2 conversation
DL/Edge Fallers:
- Rueben Bain (Miami) – Measured under 31-inch arms. Length concerns for edge work
- Cashius Howell (Texas A&M) – Measured 30.25-inch arms. Similar length concerns
- R Mason Thomas (Oklahoma) – 6-2, 241 lbs., 4.67 40. Undersized for interior, too slow for edge
- Lee Hunter (Texas Tech) – Bottom-two at position in 40 and jumps. Concerns about explosion and quickness
Linebacker Stock Movement Breakdown
Linebacker evaluation at the combine focuses on speed, fluidity in coverage, and the ability to change direction without losing balance. Teams want linebackers who can run sideline to sideline, drop into zone coverage without getting exposed, and show the kind of instincts that translate to tackles in space. This year’s class featured several prospects who posted elite speed numbers that will push them into earlier-round conversations. A few highly regarded film prospects struggled to confirm their athleticism.
Anthony Hill ran a 4.51 40, showing rare speed for a linebacker and giving defensive coordinators the flexibility to use him in multiple roles.
Sonny Styles posted athletic-freak numbers across the board, confirming his ability to play both off-ball linebacker and hybrid safety. Teams looking for versatile defenders who can match up with tight ends and running backs in the passing game now have hard numbers to justify early-round capital on both prospects.
A few linebackers who dominated on film failed to post the kind of testing numbers that translate to coverage confidence at the next level. Slower three-cone times and limited explosion metrics raised questions about whether they can handle the speed of NFL offenses, particularly in passing situations. Those prospects will need strong pro days and positive team interviews to climb back into Day 2 consideration.
LB Risers:
- Anthony Hill (Texas) – Ran 4.51 40. Rare speed for a linebacker with versatility to play multiple roles
- Sonny Styles (Ohio State) – Athletic freak with elite testing. Can play off-ball LB or hybrid safety
- Arvell Reese (Ohio State) – Posted elite numbers across the board. Hybrid edge/LB potential
LB Fallers:
- Lee Hunter (Texas Tech) – Bottom-two at position in 40 and jumps. Concerns about ability to cover in space
- R Mason Thomas (Oklahoma) – Measured 6-2, 241 lbs. and ran 4.67 40. Too slow for modern LB role
- Jermod McCoy (Tennessee) – Didn’t participate in combine after not playing in 2025. Lost all momentum
Defensive Back Stock Movement Breakdown
Defensive back testing is all about speed, hips, and ball skills. Teams want to see cornerbacks who can flip their hips without losing ground, safeties who can cover sideline to sideline, and everyone who can high-point the ball in drills. This year’s combine class delivered several prospects who posted elite 40 times and showed the kind of fluidity that translates to lockdown coverage. A few highly touted corners struggled in positional drills and fell on boards.
Lorenzo Styles ran a position-best 4.27 40, showing rare closing speed for a safety and giving teams confidence he can erase deep routes.
Dillon Thieneman ran 4.35 and might go in the top 20 after confirming his ability to play center-field safety at an elite level.
Bud Clark finished top-five among safeties in both 40 and jumps, raising his profile from a Day 3 sleeper to a potential Day 2 selection.
Colton Hood ran 4.44 at cornerback, showing the kind of long speed that teams need to match up with vertical threats on the outside.
Jermod McCoy didn’t participate in the combine after not playing in 2025, losing all momentum and likely sliding into late-round or undrafted consideration. Several cornerbacks who looked smooth on film struggled in backpedal-transition drills, raising questions about their ability to play press-man coverage at the next level. Teams looking for immediate starters at corner will likely focus on prospects who dominated both speed testing and positional drills.
DB Risers:
- Lorenzo Styles (Ohio State) – Ran position-best 4.27 40. Rare closing speed for a safety
- Dillon Thieneman (Oregon) – Ran 4.35 40. Might go in top 20 after confirming center-field ability
- Bud Clark (TCU) – Top-five among safeties in 40 and jumps. Moved from Day 3 sleeper to Day 2 consideration
- Colton Hood (Tennessee) – Ran 4.44 40. Long speed to match up with vertical threats
DB Fallers:
- Jermod McCoy (Tennessee) – Didn’t participate in combine after not playing in 2025. Lost all momentum
- Carnell Tate (Ohio State) – Slow 4.53 40 hurt his stock as a potential slot corner conversion
- Malachi Fields (Notre Dame) – 4.61 40 raised questions about ability to play outside corner at next level
- Denzel Boston (Washington) – Declined 40 and broad jump, posted 35-inch vertical. Concerns about athleticism for safety conversion
Draft Implications Following the 2026 Combine
The 2026 NFL Combine reshaped draft boards in real time, with several position groups seeing clear stratification between elite athletes and developmental projects. Teams hunting for immediate impact players in Rounds 1 and 2 now have measurable data to justify reaching on prospects who tested well. Players who opted out or disappointed will need strong pro days to climb back into early-round conversations. The class showed depth at tight end, running back (despite weak overall projections), and defensive back, with thinner-than-expected talent at wide receiver and offensive line creating potential reaches.
Expect edge rushers, defensive tackles, linebackers, and safeties to dominate Round 1 based on combine performance. Rounds 2 and 3 will likely see a run on offensive linemen, running backs, wide receivers, tight ends, and cornerbacks. Quarterbacks who tested well (Drew Allar, Taylen Green) could see their draft stock climb into the top 15 if teams fall in love with upside. Prospects who struggled (Carson Beck, Diego Pavia) may slide into Day 2 or later. The combine confirmed that this class rewards teams willing to prioritize athleticism and projection over safe floor plays.
Final Words
Explosive 40s, slick route drills and a few medical concerns reshuffled names and draft ranges across the board. This piece walked through quarterbacks, backs, receivers, tight ends, lines and defensive groups, then sketched the likely draft fallout.
The takeaway: teams will tweak boards, some sleepers became serious options, and a few supposed locks slipped. We tracked position-by-position risers and fallers after the 2026 combine, so expect more pre-draft movement — and that means a more exciting run-up to draft night.
FAQ
Q: What were the biggest risers and fallers at the 2026 NFL Combine?
A: The biggest risers and fallers at the 2026 NFL Combine were players who posted elite athletic tests or stumbled in key drills, producing four clear risers and four fallers that shifted early-round projections.
Q: How did 40-yard dash and explosion metrics change player stock?
A: The 40-yard dash and explosion metrics changed player stock by spotlighting top-end speed and burst; fast times boosted receivers and backs, while poor marks knocked prospects down several draft spots.
Q: What quarterback combine tests mattered most for 2026 stock movement?
A: The quarterback combine tests that mattered most were live-throwing accuracy, arm velocity, S2 cognitive screening (processing), and athletic movement; strong showings in those areas notably raised boards.
Q: How did running back testing affect their draft value?
A: Running back testing affected draft value by rewarding sub-4.5 speed, high vertical/broad jumps, and quick change-of-direction; larger backs who failed agility or receiving drills lost stock.
Q: Which wide receiver drills moved draft stock the most?
A: The wide receiver drills that moved draft stock most were the 40-yard dash, position route-running sessions, catch-point work, and separation drills; speed plus reliable hands produced the biggest jumps.
Q: How important were tight end blocking and agility scores?
A: Tight end blocking and agility scores were important because they separated true inline blockers from receiving hybrids; strong blocking combined with sharp agility often bumped TEs into earlier rounds.
Q: What offensive lineman tests impacted their projections?
A: The offensive lineman tests that impacted projections included shuttle and 10-yard split times (movement), bench press strength, and pass-pro footwork; poor movement especially hurt high-round grades.
Q: Which defensive line or edge measurements drove stock changes?
A: The defensive line and edge measurements that drove stock changes were 10-yard split explosiveness, vertical/broad jumps, and positional rush drills; quick first steps and power lifts produced notable rises.
Q: How did linebacker and defensive back drills affect evaluations?
A: Linebacker and defensive back drills affected evaluations by showing coverage fluidity, short-area agility, and transition movement; fluid coverage players and fast, instinctive LBs climbed while stiff prospects fell.
Q: What are the main draft implications after the 2026 Combine?
A: The main draft implications after the 2026 Combine are shifted early-round needs, teams rethinking priority positions based on speed and medicals, and unexpected risers entering first-round conversations.
Q: Should teams move on a prospect based solely on combine results?
A: Teams should not move on a prospect based solely on combine results; the combine is one data point—film, medicals, interviews, and scheme fit must drive final draft decisions.
Q: Did any medical or red-flag findings notably drop players’ stock?
A: Medical or red-flag findings notably dropped players’ stock when teams flagged structural concerns or uncertain recoveries, causing several prospects to fall multiple rounds despite solid testing.